Example data - read-only demo. No tenant or customer records are shown.

Guided demo note

Read the pack gaps first

The pack view shows source citations, clock milestones, and remaining gaps before any export, helping reviewers decide what evidence to collect next.

Glossary link: evidence pack.

Claim boundary: this explains synthetic evidence operations and does not decide legal compliance, regulatory outcomes, or Ombudsman findings.

EvidenceTrail demo pack

This is a synthetic review pack for case DEMO-003. It shows how gaps, source citations, clock milestones, and print-ready review material sit together without claiming legal or Ombudsman outcomes.

Download the public sample evidence pack

Request a guided pilot demo
Open evidence gaps are highlighted

1 open gap(s) remain in this example pack score.

EvidenceTrail professional document

Awaab Ombudsman Evidence Pack

Does not assert statutory compliance; supports complaint evidence review.

Audience: Housing Ombudsman / complaint handling

Evidence: Evidence gaps open

Redactions: No filed redactions

Case: DEMO-003

Audience: Housing Ombudsman / complaint handling

Generated: 2026-06-09T09:15:00+00:00

Pack SHA-256: 2bdfc0da78ac052a2554ebb767dc852d8ac879335b422dc9e1ed60dfaa4e87b6

Provenance refs: case:DEMO-003; organisation:demo-evidencetrail; case-import-snapshot

Claim posture

Allowed claim register: C-009

EvidenceTrail helps prepare review-ready case material for internal, board, complaint-handling, or governance-style review.

This pack does not guarantee legal compliance, regulator acceptance, Ombudsman findings, litigation outcomes, or statutory compliance.

Source basis: GOV.UK Awaab's Law guidance; Housing Ombudsman Awaab's Law learning; Regulator of Social Housing.

Provenance refs: claim-register:C-009; govuk:awaabs-law-guidance; housing-ombudsman:awaabs-law-learning; rsh:organisation-source

Case Summary

Case: DEMO-003

Property: DEMO-PROP-002

Tenant reference: DEMO-TEN-003

Reported issue: No-access significant damp triage with tenant contact gap

Generated: 2026-06-09T09:15:00+00:00

Provenance refs: case:DEMO-003; organisation:demo-evidencetrail; case-import-snapshot

Evidence Completeness

Evidence gaps: 1

Completeness: 0%

  • Investigate potential significant hazard: Investigation record, attendance notes, photos, and hazard decision.

Provenance refs: case:DEMO-003; organisation:demo-evidencetrail; case-import-snapshot; source-register:statute:uksi/2025/1042:regulation 6:statutory_rule:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/1042

Clock Start Basis

No clock-start determination recorded for this case. The awareness date shown in the clock timeline has not been separately evidenced.

The clock start basis records how the awareness date was determined and by whom, so the duty trigger can be evidenced rather than asserted. It does not decide legal compliance, regulator acceptance, Ombudsman findings, or litigation outcomes.

Provenance refs: source-register:statute:uksi/2025/1042:regulation 6:statutory_rule:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/1042; case:DEMO-003; organisation:demo-evidencetrail; case-import-snapshot

Assurances Given and Honoured

No assurances to the resident are recorded for this case.

The commitments ledger records assurances given to the resident and the outcome each one reached, so promise-keeping can be evidenced rather than asserted. It does not decide legal compliance, regulator acceptance, Ombudsman findings, or litigation outcomes.

Provenance refs: case:DEMO-003; organisation:demo-evidencetrail; case-import-snapshot; source-register:statute:uksi/2025/1042:regulation 6:statutory_rule:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/1042

Defensibility Coverage Annex

2 of 5 applicable review themes evidenced; 1 partly evidenced; 2 not yet evidenced.

Recorded evidence mapped against documented review themes
Review theme Documented failure pattern Status Evidence reference / gap
Investigation recordPublished findings repeatedly cite landlords unable to evidence that an inspection or investigation took place, or what it found. (Housing Ombudsman, Spotlight on Knowledge and Information Management)Not yet evidencedNo investigation record is held: no completion timestamp, supporting citation, or investigation evidence event.
Written summary to the residentThe written summary of investigation findings is a statutory duty within 3 working days of concluding the investigation; published findings cite residents left without written findings. (Hazards in Social Housing (Prescribed Requirements) (England) Regulations 2025)Not applicableThe written-summary clock starts when an investigation concludes; no concluded investigation is recorded yet.
Access attemptsPublished findings cite landlords with no record of attempts to gain access when work stalled, leaving delay unexplained. (Housing Ombudsman, learning from severe maladministration reports)Evidencedno_access event 2026-06-08 (demo-no-access-log)
Works completion recordPublished findings cite inspection findings never converted into evidenced works, and works claimed complete with no completion record. (Housing Ombudsman, learning from severe maladministration reports)Not applicableNo works milestone is active for this case yet.
Resident communication trailPublished findings cite landlords with no record of what the resident was told or when, leaving the communication trail unverifiable. (Housing Ombudsman, Spotlight on Knowledge and Information Management)Not yet evidencedNo resident communication is recorded on this case.
Source traceabilityThe Ombudsman calls knowledge and information management the closest thing to a silver bullet; published findings cite records that could not be retrieved or traced to a source under scrutiny. (Housing Ombudsman, Spotlight on Knowledge and Information Management)Partly evidencedEvidence events carry named sources, but no source citation is linked to a statutory milestone yet.
Statutory deadline positionAwaab's Law sets investigation, written-summary, and works timescales; published findings cite deadlines passing with no evidenced action. (GOV.UK, Awaab's Law: guidance for social landlords)EvidencedInvestigate potential significant hazard: pending

This review maps recorded evidence against documented review themes from published Housing Ombudsman and Regulator of Social Housing material. It does not decide legal compliance, regulator acceptance, Ombudsman findings, or litigation outcomes.

Provenance refs: case:DEMO-003; organisation:demo-evidencetrail; case-import-snapshot; source-register:statute:uksi/2025/1042:regulation 6:statutory_rule:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/1042

Associated Hazards (Assessed Together)

Hazards linked to this case and their evidence position
Linked case Link reason Route Reported issue Evidence position Note
DEMO-002Interacting hazardspotential emergencyCeiling leak near electrics, emergency attendance overdue0% complete, 2 open gapsCeiling leak is feeding the damp reported in the adjoining room; assess and evidence both hazards together.

Linked hazards are recorded so concurrent issues at a property or household can be reviewed together rather than in isolation. The link records an operator judgement for review; it does not decide legal compliance, regulator acceptance, or Ombudsman findings.

Provenance refs: case:DEMO-003; organisation:demo-evidencetrail; case-import-snapshot; source-register:statute:uksi/2025/1042:regulation 6:statutory_rule:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/1042

Professional Judgement Trail

No interpretation decisions recorded for this case.

Interpretation decisions are made by a competent investigator or authorised landlord reviewer. EvidenceTrail records the decision, facts, guidance, and rationale for review; it does not auto-classify hazards, decide legal compliance, or replace professional judgement.

Provenance refs: case:DEMO-003; organisation:demo-evidencetrail; case-import-snapshot; source-register:statute:uksi/2025/1042:regulation 6:statutory_rule:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/1042

Defence Submission Summary

Pack Review Cockpit

Status: Open evidence gaps

Next action: Close blocking evidence gaps before treating the pack as review-ready.

  • Open gaps: 1
  • Sources: 1
  • Sources without hash: 0
  • Redactions: 0
  • Readiness issues: 6

This cockpit helps reviewers scan evidence posture; it does not decide statutory compliance, complaint outcome, regulator acceptance, or legal advice.

Audience: Housing Ombudsman / complaint handling

Case position: open_gaps

Outstanding evidence gaps: 1

Pack SHA-256: 2bdfc0da78ac052a2554ebb767dc852d8ac879335b422dc9e1ed60dfaa4e87b6

Sources without content hash: 0

Redaction status: unredacted_pack (0)

Limitations

  • Does not assert statutory compliance; records the evidence currently available for review.
  • Does not replace legal advice, complaint investigation judgement, or landlord decision-making.
  • Unhashed or missing sources remain evidential weaknesses until independently reconciled.

Outstanding Gaps

  • Investigate potential significant hazard: Investigation record, attendance notes, photos, and hazard decision.

Operational Evidence Rollup

Operational evidence rollup
Theme Status Count Latest summary Latest reference
No accesspresent1No-access visit recorded with card left and callback requestedNOACCESS-217
Tenant communicationsmissing0
Contractor evidencemissing0
Pack review approvalsmissing0

Submission Readiness

Overall status: not_ready

Blocking issues: 1

Missing evidence themes: 3

Review-needed themes: 2

Integrity manifest: awaab-evidenceos-pack-manifest-v1 (unsigned_prototype_manifest)

Manifest pack SHA-256: 2bdfc0da78ac052a2554ebb767dc852d8ac879335b422dc9e1ed60dfaa4e87b6

Recompute the pack hash and reconcile the source register before external submission; this manifest is not a digital signature.

Submission readiness checks
Check Status Evidence
Statutory clock evidenceblocking1 open statutory-clock evidence gap(s)
Source integrityready1 source(s), 0 without content hash
Redaction registerreview_neededNo redaction markers listed; confirm whether pack can remain unredacted
Tenant communicationsmissingNo tenant communication evidence recorded in this pack
Contractor evidencemissingNo contractor evidence recorded in this pack
No-access trailready1 event(s); latest: No-access visit recorded with card left and callback requested
External access auditreview_needed0 notification(s), 0 open(s), 0 submission(s), 0 revocation(s)
Pack reviewmissing0 approved review(s), 0 rejected review(s)

Recommended Next Actions

  • Close open statutory-clock evidence gaps before external submission.
  • Attach tenant communications or record why none are available.
  • Attach contractor evidence or record why contractor evidence is absent.
  • Reconcile proof-link delivery, open, submission, and revocation audit data.
  • Request authorised pack review approval before external submission.
  • Confirm privacy review outcome before sharing the pack externally.

External Access Audit

Notifications prepared: 0

Delivery events recorded: 0

Delivered: 0

Failed delivery events: 0

Delivery channels: None recorded

Proof-link opens: 0

Proof-link submissions: 0

Proof-link revocations: 0

Latest external-access event: None recorded

Pack Review Audit

Reviews: 0

Approved reviews: 0

Rejected reviews: 0

Latest pack-review event: None recorded

Review Sources

  • Housing Ombudsman hazard complaints guidance: clear records, action taken, alternative accommodation, complaint handling
  • Housing Ombudsman Complaint Handling Code 2024: complaint reasoning, outcomes, and full complaint record

Statutory Basis

Statutory basis
Milestone Provision Source
Investigate potential significant hazardregulation 6https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/1042

Provenance refs: case:DEMO-003; organisation:demo-evidencetrail; case-import-snapshot; source-register:statute:uksi/2025/1042:regulation 6:statutory_rule:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/1042; audit-event:case_link.recorded:DEMO-003:2026-06-08T13:15:00+00:00; evidence-event:no_access:demo-no-access-log:NOACCESS-217

Housing Ombudsman Evidence Request Map

This pack is structured to correspond to common Housing Ombudsman evidence-request categories. It is not approved by, endorsed by, or submitted to the Ombudsman.

Use the operator board report to cross-check open gaps before sharing this pack.

Ombudsman evidence-request section map
Evidence-request category Pack material Source basis Reviewer cue
Communications recordsTenant, contractor, landlord, and proof-link communications captured in the timeline, source register, and external-access audit.Housing Ombudsman complaint evidence and Awaab's Law learning context.Check chronology, missed responses, delivery evidence, and caveats.
System and case notesCase summary, operator notes, audit events, import history, and review decisions linked to this case.Housing Ombudsman Scheme fairness and evidence review posture.Check notes explain decisions without adding unsupported legal conclusions.
Repairs and inspection recordsClock timeline, investigation milestones, work evidence, contractor updates, and source citations.GOV.UK Awaab's Law guidance and Ombudsman repairs-record decisions.Check repair actions, inspection dates, completion evidence, and gaps.
Decisions and rationaleDefence submission summary, outstanding gaps, review cockpit, pack review audit, and limitation statements.Housing Ombudsman decision-making posture: fair in the circumstances.Check rationale is source-linked and does not claim Ombudsman approval.

Source citations: Housing Ombudsman Awaab's Law learning resources; Housing Ombudsman Scheme; GOV.UK Awaab's Law guidance.

Provenance refs: govuk:awaabs-law-guidance; housing-ombudsman:awaabs-law-learning; housing-ombudsman:scheme; case:DEMO-003; organisation:demo-evidencetrail; case-import-snapshot; source-register:statute:uksi/2025/1042:regulation 6:statutory_rule:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/1042

No-access Reasonable Endeavours Evidence

This section assembles access-attempt context for human review. It does not decide tenant fault, access validity, legal compliance, or whether reasonable endeavours have been proved.

No-access reasonable endeavours narrative table
Step Channel Scheduled/occurred Outcome Evidence note Source/audit reference
demo-no-access-log2026-06-08T13:15:00+00:00no_accessNo-access visit recorded with card left and callback requestedNOACCESS-217

Source citations: Regulation 20 access context; GOV.UK Awaab's Law guidance; Housing Ombudsman Awaab's Law learning resources.

Provenance refs: regulation-20:access-context; evidence-event:no_access:demo-no-access-log:NOACCESS-217

Pack Integrity

Version: 1

Pack SHA-256: 2bdfc0da78ac052a2554ebb767dc852d8ac879335b422dc9e1ed60dfaa4e87b6

Sources: 1

Sources without content hash: 0

Fingerprint verification: any holder of this pack can confirm the SHA-256 fingerprint above matches a recorded pack generation at https://evidencetrail.co.uk/verify. A match confirms the generation record only; it does not verify pack contents or any compliance outcome.

Redaction register
Marker Target Reason Status
No applied redactions.

Provenance refs: pack-sha256:2bdfc0da78ac052a2554ebb767dc852d8ac879335b422dc9e1ed60dfaa4e87b6; source-count:1; sources-without-hash:0; source-register:statute:uksi/2025/1042:regulation 6:statutory_rule:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/1042

Source Register

Registered sources: 1

Sources with content hash: 1

Statutory rule sources: 1

Source rows help reviewers trace facts to documents or citations; they do not prove source completeness, legal sufficiency, or external acceptance.

Source register
Source Type Reference SHA-256 Custody status Supports Review cue
The Hazards in Social Housing (Prescribed Requirements) (England) Regulations 2025 regulation 6statutory_rulehttps://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/10427fa7611243a62dcf76bffaf0eca4de4c442f6157a1b42a38b80c556ccab64ddbhash_recordedsignificant_investigationTrace milestone claim to this source during review.

Provenance refs: source-register:statute:uksi/2025/1042:regulation 6:statutory_rule:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/1042

Chain of Custody

Chain of custody
Action Occurred Evidence
case_snapshot_captured2026-06-09T09:15:00+00:00case fields serialised for pack versioning
source_register_compiled2026-06-09T09:15:00+00:001 sources listed
redaction_register_compiled2026-06-09T09:15:00+00:000 redaction markers listed
pack_hash_computed2026-06-09T09:15:00+00:002bdfc0da78ac052a2554ebb767dc852d8ac879335b422dc9e1ed60dfaa4e87b6

Provenance refs: pack-sha256:2bdfc0da78ac052a2554ebb767dc852d8ac879335b422dc9e1ed60dfaa4e87b6; source-count:1; sources-without-hash:0; custody:case_snapshot_captured:2026-06-09T09:15:00+00:00; custody:source_register_compiled:2026-06-09T09:15:00+00:00; custody:redaction_register_compiled:2026-06-09T09:15:00+00:00; custody:pack_hash_computed:2026-06-09T09:15:00+00:00

Clock Timeline

Clock timeline milestones
Milestone Status Due Completed Evidence required
Investigate potential significant hazardpending2026-06-22T17:00:00Investigation record, attendance notes, photos, and hazard decision.

Provenance refs: source-register:statute:uksi/2025/1042:regulation 6:statutory_rule:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/1042; case:DEMO-003; organisation:demo-evidencetrail; case-import-snapshot

Evidence Appendix

Appendix events: 1

Distinct sources: 1

Appendix rows are supporting evidence for review. They do not prove completeness, legal sufficiency, or that redaction and disclosure review is finished.

Evidence appendix
Captured Type Summary Source Reference Review cue
2026-06-08T13:15:00+00:00no_accessNo-access visit recorded with card left and callback requesteddemo-no-access-logNOACCESS-217Review access context neutrally before relying on it.