1. Treat as technical input
Use this page with the DPA/DPIA annex as review material, not signed legal terms or a customer privacy notice.
A procurement-facing summary for UK social-landlord pilot review. It explains the current prototype processor posture, cookies position, and the evidence still required before production contracting.
This page is not legal advice, not a signed Data Processing Agreement, not a full customer privacy notice, and not a completed DPIA.
Phase 2 announced for Oct 2026: see what changes.
Suitable as a technical annex for customer legal and DPO review, not a signed DPA, completed DPIA, tenant privacy notice, or transfer assessment.
EvidenceTrail is positioned for UK social-landlord procurement review, while Awaab's Law legal-scope wording remains limited to the England social rented sector.
Use this page with the DPA/DPIA annex as review material, not signed legal terms or a customer privacy notice.
Customer legal/DPO owners still decide lawful basis, retention, rights handling, transfers, and tenant privacy information.
Public-page measurement is server-side and privacy safe. Marketing cookies, browser tracking storage, or preference profiles still need consent and preference controls before launch.
EvidenceTrail is intended to support social landlords as a processor for tenant, property, evidence, repair, complaint, and contractor records during a customer-approved pilot.
Article 28 terms still need customer legal approval. The current materials are technical and procurement inputs, not signed contract terms.
Prototype public pages do not set non-essential analytics or marketing cookies. Server-side Plausible events run in null mode unless environment keys are configured. If non-essential storage or tracking is added later, consent and preference controls must be implemented before launch.
This field map is generated from current product model field groups for DPA/DPIA review. It is a technical review aid, not a completed Record of Processing Activities, signed processing schedule, customer privacy notice, or legal advice.
| Model | Fields | Data category | Purpose | Controller decision | Production gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AwaabCase | organisation_id, case_id, property_reference, tenant_reference | Case, property, organisation, and tenant references | Link imported repair or complaint records to the correct organisation, property, and tenant reference for evidence-pack review. | Customer controller confirms reference formats, lawful basis, privacy notice coverage, and whether tenant references may be processed in pilot. | Customer-approved data schedule, retention, return, and deletion evidence. |
| AwaabCase | awareness_at, route, reported_issue, confirmed_hazard | Hazard triage and statutory-clock context | Surface operational clock visibility, triage route, and source issue wording without making legal compliance conclusions. | Customer legal/domain owner confirms scope, special-category risk, and tenant privacy information before live data use. | Legal/DPO review of live issue descriptions and statutory-scope wording. |
| AwaabCase | investigation_concluded_at, written_summary_sent_at, relevant_safety_work_completed_at, supplementary_work_started_at, alternative_accommodation_offered_at | Repair lifecycle timestamps and review milestones | Build a source-cited operational timeline for internal review, evidence gaps, and pilot readouts. | Customer confirms source systems, retention period, evidence owners, and whether dates can be shared with reviewers. | Signed processing instructions for source-system exports and reviewers. |
| EvidenceEvent | occurred_at, event_type, summary, source, actor, external_reference | Evidence timeline entries and source references | Record evidence provenance, event type, actor/source reference, and review notes for case packs. | Customer decides source permissions, redaction needs, evidence upload rules, and subject-rights handling. | Customer-approved evidence-source policy, redaction workflow, and DSR process. |
| Area | Current prototype evidence | Production gap |
|---|---|---|
| Documented instructions | Product scope and evidence workflows are described for pilot review. | Signed customer instructions and processing schedule are not approved. |
| Confidentiality and security | Trust centre and procurement pack document prototype controls. | Approved contractual security measures and staff confidentiality process. |
| Subprocessors | No production subprocessors have been appointed. | Approved subprocessor schedule, objection process, and residency evidence. |
| Rights, breach, and DPIA assistance | Internal DSR report, redaction, disclosure-manifest, and incident drafts exist. | Customer-approved assistance commitments, notice timings, and legal workflow. |
| Deletion and return | Prototype evidence-pack and privacy-review surfaces describe limitations. | Reversible lifecycle policy, export/return procedure, and deletion evidence. |
This product page does not replace the customer's privacy notice to tenants, residents, staff, contractors, or complainants. Pilot customers still need to decide controller purposes, lawful basis, retention, recipients, international transfers, rights handling, and contact details for their own privacy information.
The customer legal/DPO owner should confirm lawful basis and tenant privacy information, retention schedule and deletion/return instructions, subprocessor approvals and international transfer assessment, and subject-rights and breach-assistance workflow before production use.