See source-mapped clocks, next due milestones, and overdue or at-risk cases.
Awaab cases rarely live in one clean system
Repairs records, complaint notes, emails, contractor updates, tenant photos, no-access evidence, and board reporting often sit in separate places. EvidenceOS gives repairs and compliance teams a shared evidence layer around those systems.
Spot missing investigation, communication, contractor, access, and pack evidence.
Prepare conservative board, complaint-handling, or internal governance-style material for review.
Overlay workflow across existing systems
EvidenceOS does not replace housing management, repairs, complaints, tenant, or contractor systems. It joins the evidence questions that cut across them: what happened, which clock is live, what proof is missing, and who needs to review it.
Import report dates, inspections, safety works, access attempts, and job notes.
Connect complaint stage, promised actions, review owner, and board-report needs.
Track tenant updates, vulnerability notes, proof-link responses, and redaction status.
Pull contractor updates, visit outcomes, supporting photos, and unresolved blockers.
What the 14-day pilot proves
Start with sample case data, map the first workflow, and show exactly where evidence exists, where it is missing, and what a reviewer can see.
Use CSV exports, saved mappings, shared inbox records, and source references.
Send zero-login evidence links to tenants and contractors without internal access. Proof links ask for scoped evidence, not blame.
Review clock status, evidence gaps, redaction notes, and pack-readiness evidence.
Source-backed proof, not sales theatre
The homepage uses primary UK sources and product evidence language. No fabricated customer logos, no invented savings claims, and no compliance guarantees are used as proof.
Source-mapped milestones make at-risk and overdue case work visible without turning the product into legal advice.
Missing investigation, communication, contractor, access, and pack evidence is shown as operational work to review.
Tenants and contractors can contribute evidence through scoped links rather than receiving internal system access.
Packs collect clock status, citations, redaction notes, source references, and known gaps for board, complaint-handling, or internal governance-style review.
Right fit
- Registered providers, ALMOs, and council housing teams.
- Teams with fragmented repairs, complaints, inbox, and contractor evidence.
- Leaders who need board, complaint-handling, or governance-style review material.
Not right for
- Buyers seeking a full repairs-management replacement.
- Teams seeking legal advice or compliance guarantees.
- Private landlords outside the current social-housing scope.
Choose your landlord path
Start from the operating model that matches the buyer group. Each path keeps the language to role-specific operational review rather than legal advice or outcome promises.
Registered provider route
For housing associations and private registered providers aligning repairs, complaints, compliance, and board evidence.
Registered provider fitALMO route
For arm's-length management organisations that need group reporting, council governance context, and clear operating boundaries.
Request ALMO discussion via demo requestsLocal authority route
For council housing teams coordinating repairs, complaints, tenant contact, scrutiny reporting, and information-governance review.
Local authority fitObjections buyers raise before a pilot
The pilot path is designed to answer buyer risk without overstating the product. These are operational answers, not legal advice or compliance guarantees.
EvidenceOS sits beside existing repairs, complaints, tenant, and contractor tools. It keeps source references visible rather than asking teams to rip out the system of record.
Start with a scoped pilot and review the buying-room materials before deeper integrations. Open procurement pack.
The product supports evidence gathering and review; a landlord or adviser still decides legal significance for each case.
Proof links can collect scoped evidence without asking tenants to log into landlord systems or exposing internal records.
Redaction, audit metadata, and DPA/DPIA inputs stay visible for buyer security, privacy, and procurement review. Review trust posture.
Built for procurement review, not hand-waving
EvidenceOS keeps trust materials close to the product: security answers, DPA/DPIA posture, redaction, audit export, backup notes, incident handling, and conservative source mapping.
Buyer questions
No. It is an overlay for statutory-clock visibility and evidence preparation.
No. It supports evidence gathering, operational review, and pack preparation.
A sample case, clock status, evidence gaps, proof links, and a review-ready pack.